Employees considering claiming constructive dismissal need to do much more than just show their treatment is something they disagree with or don’t like. Potential claimants should make an assessment the risks involved before deciding how to respond to such a situation at work, and employers should be reassured that an employee faces a significant burden in proving his or her case.
Tribunal and EAT
A recent Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision in the case Frenkel Topping v King is a good reminder of these points. In the case, the employee succeeded in her claim of constructive dismissal (and, therefore, unfair dismissal) on the basis of her numerous allegations of poor treatment. These included unfair and inappropriate criticism of her performance, which on one occasion involved her being humiliated in front of colleagues, and threats to increase her working hours. However, she failed to prove that the reason for her treatment – and, therefore, for her constructive dismissal – was a number of protected disclosures she had made about charging arrangements to clients (in other words, whistleblowing).
Her resignation (necessary for a constructive dismissal claim) was found to have been principally because of the breakdown of trust and confidence between her and her employer caused by her various complaints rather than the two whistleblowing disclosures she had made. So she succeeded in claiming ‘normal’ unfair dismissal but not in her claim of automatically unfair dismissal for whistleblowing, to which the cap on compensation does not apply.
The tribunal was held to have been entitled to reach the conclusions which it did but the EAT, as its summary of the case put it, reminded tribunals that the conduct an employee is complaining of must be "really serious". In its decision, the EAT emphasised the "stringency" of the constructive dismissal test which requires an employee to show what has been described as "conduct with which an employee could not be expected to put up".
The EAT also reiterated the point that the legal test for whether or not a constructive dismissal claim can succeed is not whether the breach complained of is the principal reason for the employee's resignation but whether the employee resigned because some or all of the employer’s conduct amounted to a repudiatory breach of contract (in other words, sufficiently serious that it brings the employment contract to an end).
First Floor Offices, 11-23 Market St.
Tel: 01427 678660
HR and Accounts:
26/26a Hickman Street
Tel: 01427 678660
West 1, West Dock Street
Hull HU3 4HH
Tel: 01482 534 348
Hyde Park House, Cartwright Street
Newton, Hyde, Cheshire SK14 4EH
Tel: 0161 367 1214
2450 Regents Court The Crescent
Birmingham Business Park Solihull B37 7YE
Tel: 0121 69 59 290
4th Floor, 86-90 Paul Street
London EC2A 4NE
Tel: 0207 111 0958
Copyright © 2017 Stallard Kane Associates. All rights reserved.